It looks like the fedora rpm doesn't set any Log lines in the torrc,
but it does set RunAsDaemon 1 so it forks into the background. If you
don't set any Log lines in the torrc file, then Tor will log to stdout
by default. And the fork will close that log.
Are all the rpm users supposed to know to uncomment a Log line?
Trac: Description: It looks like the fedora rpm doesn't set any Log lines in the torrc,
but it does set RunAsDaemon 1 so it forks into the background. If you
don't set any Log lines in the torrc file, then Tor will log to stdout
by default. And the fork will close that log.
Are all the rpm users supposed to know to uncomment a Log line?
Or maybe the torrc on fedora rpm should just uncomment the 'log notice file ...'
line?
[Automatically added by flyspray2trac: Operating System: All]
to
It looks like the fedora rpm doesn't set any Log lines in the torrc,
but it does set RunAsDaemon 1 so it forks into the background. If you
don't set any Log lines in the torrc file, then Tor will log to stdout
by default. And the fork will close that log.
Are all the rpm users supposed to know to uncomment a Log line?
This sucks. The packager for Fedora breaks our recommendations for no good reason?
He doesn't have to deal with users who don't have logs and don't realize that it's Fedora's fault, not our fault, that they don't have logs.
I guess we should add another clause to https://www.torproject.org/docs/faq#Logs saying "if you're using Fedora's RPM, you will have to set up your logs manually because the package doesn't do it for you"?
Is it still the case that the tor rpm that fedora ships is broken in this way? (Should we send fedora a cease-and-desist notice telling them to quit shipping broken tor rpms?)