Changes between Initial Version and Version 1 of Ticket #12891, comment 11


Ignore:
Timestamp:
Jun 25, 2015, 9:52:33 PM (4 years ago)
Author:
robgjansen
Comment:

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • Ticket #12891, comment 11

    initial v1  
    1 I believe the results I posted above are invalid. I recently found and fixed several bugs in Shadow which affected network performance, and created a more recent model of Tor that we were using for our peerflow experiments. I have higher confidence in this model after running many many experiments with it and analyzing results obtained with it.
     1I believe the results I posted [https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/12891#comment:7 in comment 7] are invalid. I recently found and fixed several bugs in Shadow which affected network performance, and created a more recent model of Tor that we were using for our peerflow experiments. I have higher confidence in this model after running many many experiments with it and analyzing results obtained with it.
    22
    33I compared Torperf performance in Tor vs in Shadow with my new fancy model. Those [https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/attachment/ticket/12891/shadowtorperf-ideal-model-from-ccs-peerflow.pdf results are attached here]. It appears that Shadow is again tracking Tor performance nicely. (I believe the difference in time to first byte is because Karsten and I are starting our download timers at different points, which we just realized this week.)