prop224: Implement relay side support

Implement the support for RP and IP that is new cell format and ntor handshake. This would be support of 224 only on the relay side for communication between nodes.

changed milestone to %Tor: 0.3.0.x-final

added component::core tor/tor milestone::Tor: 0.3.0.x-final owner::dgoulet parent::12424 points::parent priority::high prop224 resolution::fixed reviewer::asn reviewer::dgoulet severity::normal sponsor::R-must status::closed tor-hs type::enhancement labels

Trac:
Severity: N/A to Normal
Cc: N/A to teor

Moving this one to 0.2.9 because it would be a reasonable goal to have it by then I think. Worst case, we differ to later.

Trac:
Milestone: Tor: 0.2.??? to Tor: 0.2.9.x-final
Reviewer: N/A to N/A
Priority: Medium to High
Sponsor: N/A to None

These tickets had Sponsor == "None". Our convention seems to be Sponsor == "".

Trac:
Sponsor: None to N/A

Trac:
Reviewer: N/A to asn, dgoulet

Trac:
Sponsor: N/A to SponsorR-must

Trac:
Points: large to 6

Renaming for clearer title and removing points which should be in the child ticket.

Trac:
Summary: Implement relay side support of proposal 224 to prop224: Implement relay side support
Points: 6 to N/A

Trac:
Keywords: N/A deleted, sponsorr-0.2.10 added
Milestone: Tor: 0.2.9.x-final to Tor: 0.2.???

Trac:
Keywords: sponsorr-0.2.10 deleted, 0210-proposed added

Trac:
Keywords: 0210-proposed deleted, 030-proposed added

Trac:
Keywords: 030-proposed deleted, prop224 added
Points: N/A to parent
Milestone: Tor: 0.2.??? to Tor: 0.3.0.x-final

Trac:
Owner: N/A to dgoulet
Status: new to accepted

Now that #20029 (moved) is closed, is this done too?

We are done in theory with relay side :). Big milestone accomplished! Thanks all!

Trac:
Resolution: N/A to fixed
Status: accepted to closed

closed

mentioned in issue #19043 (moved)

mentioned in issue #20004 (moved)

mentioned in issue #20571 (moved)

mentioned in issue #20656 (moved)

mentioned in issue #20992 (moved)

moved to tpo/core/tor#17241 (closed)

mentioned in issue tpo/core/tor#20004 (closed)

mentioned in issue tpo/core/tor#20656 (closed)