bridges.torproject.org could use a favicon

It doesn't have one. It could. I don't particularly care what it is, but a little bridge or a little onion might be cute.

added actualpoints::0.2 component::circumvention/bridgedb easy owner::phw parent::31279 points::1 priority::very low resolution::implemented reviewer::cohosh s30-o22a2 severity::minor sponsor::30-must status::closed type::enhancement ux-team labels

I made this draft:

512x512 version:

32x32 version:

The Obfs logo could also be used as a favicon:

Trac:
Username: vapour

Trac:
Description: It doesn't have one. It could. I don't particular care what it is, but a little bridge or a little onion might be cute.

to

It doesn't have one. It could. I don't particularly care what it is, but a little bridge or a little onion might be cute.

Replying to vapour:

I made this draft: 32x32 version:

Hey, thanks! This is great! It's a little bit crowded with both the bridge and the onion when viewed at 16x16 or 24x24 size, but for now this is good for stopping all the 404 /favicon messages in the logs.

Perhaps we could do either the bridge or the onion? And maybe in colour with a transparent background? (Not sure which colour… the ux team is about to release style guidelines and I don't know what they recommend yet.)

Trac:
Status: new to needs_revision

Trac:
Owner: isis to antonela
Sponsor: N/A to Sponsor19
Status: needs_revision to assigned

adding UX team

Trac:
Keywords: ux deleted, ux-team added

Remove sponsor 19 and add a keyword ex-sponsor19 to mark all the tickets that could have been in the scope of the sponsor.

Trac:
Sponsor: Sponsor19 to N/A
Keywords: N/A deleted, ex-sponsor19 added

Adding s30 here

Trac:
Keywords: N/A deleted, Sponsor30-must added

Trac:
Sponsor: N/A to Sponsor30-must
Keywords: Sponsor30-must deleted, N/A added

Trac:
Keywords: ex-sponsor19 deleted, s30-o22a2 added
Parent: N/A to #31279 (closed)

I'm snatching this ticket because it's an easy fix.

Trac:
Owner: antonela to phw

Trac:

BridgeDB favicon

I took the favicon from torproject.org and added it to BridgeDB. Here's my patch: https://github.com/NullHypothesis/bridgedb/compare/enhancement/19774

And here's what it looks like in the browser:

Trac:
Status: assigned to needs_review

Trac:
Reviewer: N/A to cohosh

Looks good!

Trac:
Status: needs_review to merge_ready

Merged into develop in commit 6d3e899.

Trac:
Actualpoints: N/A to 0.2
Resolution: N/A to implemented
Status: merge_ready to closed

closed

changed time estimate to 8h

added 1h 36m of time spent

mentioned in issue #31537 (moved)

mentioned in issue #31279 (closed)

moved to tpo/anti-censorship/bridgedb#19774 (closed)