I just talked to teor about an idea where, when we say things like
- Remove broken entries from the hard-coded fallback directory list. Closes ticket 20190; patch by teor.
we should say how many we removed and how many remain.
This will be useful in the short term for reassuring ourselves that enough remain, and in the longer term for analyzing patterns in how our working fallback sets decay.
To upload designs, you'll need to enable LFS and have an admin enable hashed storage. More information
Child items ...
Show closed items
Linked items 0
Link issues together to show that they're related.
Learn more.
Sure you don't want to backport it to 0.2.9 ? Otherwise it won't appear in changelogs that come out for future 0.2.9 versions?
I'd be happy for an 0.2.9 backport (the fallback feature itself was introduced in 0.2.8, not sure if we want to backport the relevant parts of the changelog that far back).
Sure you don't want to backport it to 0.2.9 ? Otherwise it won't appear in changelogs that come out for future 0.2.9 versions?
The change really was simply a change to old stanzas in the changelog. So future 0.2.9 versions can have better changelog entries because teor's improved scripts (not included in this merge) will produce better ones.
So I think it's fine as-is. But if somebody wants to merge the changes into maint-0.2.9 too, it is fine with me!
Hm. I'm actually thinking that the backport isn't so likely now, given that 029 is stable. All other things being equal, I prefer not to change old changelogs.