Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
Closed Vidalia network map should distinguish circuit types
  • View options
  • Vidalia network map should distinguish circuit types

  • View options
  • Closed Issue created by Roger Dingledine

    In Vidalia's network map we show circuits that Tor is building. That's great, but there are cases where it confuses users. In particular, some Tor circuits are 1-hop (for fetching directory information but also using a layer of encryption), and some are internal (for everything other than attaching exit streams). Many users are concerned by the one-hop circuits they see (thinking that Tor is planning to use them for exit streams), and a smaller but still significant number of users set ExcludeExitNodes and then freak out when Tor uses that node as the last hop in an internal (non-exit) circuit. I think both cases would be partially resolved by having Vidalia present the circuit list more clearly.

    How would we do this? One option would be a "type" column in the circuit listing, where we describe each circuit as "directory", "exit", or "internal". Another option would be to have separate rows in the circuit listing: put all the exit circuits at the top under the heading "exit circuits", then "internal circuits" and the list of internal circuits, then finally all the 1-hop directory circuits with their own heading. I like option 2 slightly better. I wonder if there are still better approaches?

    Vidalia can learn the circuit purpose via the controlport, from the (alas undocumented) "PURPOSE=" argument in circuit status. But I think we don't export other flags, like "build_state->onehop_tunnel". We should first change Tor so it exports these flags in a more usable way.

    Linked items ... 0

  • Activity

    • All activity
    • Comments only
    • History only
    • Newest first
    • Oldest first
    Loading Loading Loading Loading Loading Loading Loading Loading Loading Loading