Changes between Initial Version and Version 1 of Ticket #23761, comment 15


Ignore:
Timestamp:
Nov 15, 2017, 10:17:53 PM (18 months ago)
Author:
isis
Comment:

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • Ticket #23761, comment 15

    initial v1  
    66> I've cc'd isis, because they will have a better idea of which IPv6 bridge stats would be useful. (I'd say "like the existing bridge stats", or "like the IPv6 relay stats", but I'd only be guessing.)
    77 
    8 Hi! I believe the BridgeAuth doesn't do IPv6 reachability checks, and it does '''not''' set `AuthDirHasIPv6Connectivity 1` (cf. #24262). We don't have bandwidth checks at all for bridges right now, but we should have them soon. (I don't know yet when we'll have IPv6 bandwidth checks, perhaps this is a good task for the next IPv6 hackathon?)
     8Hi! I believe the BridgeAuth doesn't do IPv6 reachability checks, and it does '''not''' set `AuthDirHasIPv6Connectivity 1` (cf. #24264). We don't have bandwidth checks at all for bridges right now, but we should have them soon. (I don't know yet when we'll have IPv6 bandwidth checks, perhaps this is a good task for the next IPv6 hackathon?)
    99
    1010The bridge graph above is good since if/when `AuthDirHasIPv6Connectivity 1` is enabled on the BridgeAuth we'll see if it hits any bugs with accidentally (or purposefully, it's difficult to tell if there's only one BridgeAuth) excluding large numbers of bridges. I'd be curious to see how many of each transport are offered on IPv6 addresses, since (sorry, bad data from kludgily grepping the BridgeDB logfiles…) there's extremely few requests for IPv6 bridges. I believe that dgoulet's bridge is the only bridge to offer an IPv6 pluggable transport, but I haven't checked in a while.