Opened 8 months ago
Closed 6 months ago
#23828 closed defect (implemented)
Authorities: Remove IPv6 addresses from microdescriptors
| Reported by: | teor | Owned by: | teor |
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | Medium | Milestone: | Tor: 0.3.3.x-final |
| Component: | Core Tor/Tor | Version: | |
| Severity: | Normal | Keywords: | ipv6, review-group-25, review-group-26 |
| Cc: | Actual Points: | 0.2 | |
| Parent ID: | #20916 | Points: | 0.5 |
| Reviewer: | Sponsor: | SponsorV-can |
Description
When #23826 is locked in, we should remove IPv6 addresses from microdescs.
Child Tickets
Change History (9)
comment:1 Changed 7 months ago by
| Milestone: | Tor: 0.3.6.x-final → Tor: 0.3.3.x-final |
|---|---|
| Points: | → 0.5 |
| Summary: | Remove IPv6 addresses from microdescriptors → Authorities: Remove IPv6 addresses from microdescriptors |
comment:2 Changed 7 months ago by
| Actual Points: | → 0.2 |
|---|---|
| Sponsor: | → SponsorV-can |
comment:3 Changed 7 months ago by
| Status: | new → needs_review |
|---|
comment:4 Changed 7 months ago by
| Owner: | set to teor |
|---|---|
| Status: | needs_review → assigned |
These are all mine
comment:5 Changed 7 months ago by
| Status: | assigned → needs_review |
|---|
These have code and a proposal in progress on tor-dev@
comment:6 Changed 7 months ago by
| Keywords: | review-group-25 added |
|---|
comment:7 Changed 6 months ago by
| Status: | needs_review → merge_ready |
|---|
This code looks good to me, modulo open questions on proposal 283 [*]. After we discuss them, we should either merge this, or put it into needs_revision, depending on the outcome.
[*] https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-dev/2017-November/012543.html
comment:9 Changed 6 months ago by
| Resolution: | → implemented |
|---|---|
| Status: | merge_ready → closed |
Still looks good; squashed and merged to master.
Note: See
TracTickets for help on using
tickets.
Actually, it's safe for us to do this in the next consensus method after #23826.
This is implemented in my tor branch bug23826-23828 along with #23826. The corresponding torspec entry is in my torspec branch bug23826-23828, and is tracked in ticket #23898.