Changes between Initial Version and Version 1 of Ticket #23829, comment 7


Ignore:
Timestamp:
Oct 20, 2017, 10:00:41 AM (21 months ago)
Author:
cypherpunks
Comment:

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • Ticket #23829, comment 7

    initial v1  
    99
    1010I is probably not valuable to implement negation for unqualified search terms, but I
    11 still would see a use case in being able to say "not in IP block a.b.(c.)" - which implies that we might want a new 'ip' url parameter?
     11still would see a use case in being able to say "not in IP block a.b.(c.)" - which implies that we might want a new `ip` url parameter?
    1212
    1313>> All use-cases can be formed with the ! sign being used in the value part only, right?