Opened 2 years ago

Closed 2 years ago

#24235 closed defect (fixed)

Explain circuits better in the glossary

Reported by: teor Owned by: teor
Priority: Medium Milestone:
Component: Metrics/Website Version:
Severity: Normal Keywords:
Cc: Actual Points: 0.1
Parent ID: Points: 0.1
Reviewer: Sponsor:

Description

The current explanation is incorrect (there are single-hop circuits).

Child Tickets

Change History (6)

comment:1 Changed 2 years ago by teor

Status: newneeds_review

Please see my branch bug24235 on github.

comment:2 Changed 2 years ago by teor

Owner: changed from metrics-team to teor
Status: needs_reviewassigned

comment:3 Changed 2 years ago by teor

Status: assignedneeds_review

comment:4 Changed 2 years ago by karsten

Status: needs_reviewneeds_revision

Can we somehow keep the single-sentence-per-definition format by condensing the updated definition into a single sentence? How's this?

Oh, and let's not introduce "anonymous circuit" as a term in this definition, or we'll have to add a separate definition for that and also for non-anonymous circuits.

(At some point we should consider switching to a Tor-wide glossary. But back when we started ours, such a thing did not exist.)

comment:5 Changed 2 years ago by teor

Status: needs_revisionmerge_ready

That looks fine.

comment:6 Changed 2 years ago by karsten

Resolution: fixed
Status: merge_readyclosed

Great! Merged and deployed. Closing. Thanks!

Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets.