We should seriously look into signing our own extensions for Tor Browser 8. This includes the language packs we modify as well now (see: #26465 (moved)).
To upload designs, you'll need to enable LFS and have an admin enable hashed storage. More information
Child items ...
Show closed items
Linked items 0
Link issues together to show that they're related.
Learn more.
We at Tails currently patch the add-on signature checking code (on top of your current patch that adds a whitelist with if (aAddon.id == […] aka. 0714762d25415271191503903a9f2fb0627ca38d on the tor-browser-60.1.0esr-8.0-1 branch) to add uBlock to the list. We've discussed this on the https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tbb-dev/2017-April/000515.html thread, where it seems that we (TBB team + Tails) reached a tentative agreement to move the whitelist to a pref. But so far we failed to write the corresponding code, sorry! FTR on Tails' side this is tracked on https://labs.riseup.net/code/issues/12571.
It would be extremely helpful if the resolution for this ticket made things better for us (e.g. keep that patch and create a pref with the list of allowed unsigned add-ons, empty by default for TBB, where we would add uBlock) instead of worse. Things would get worse for us if the code that adds a whitelist with if (aAddon.id == […] was fully removed: then we would need to carry it as part of Tails delta, which is quite ugly and painful.