Publish bandwidth files only when they contain only the 60% of relays

When running sbws in the way it behaves as Torflow. As commented in https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/28042#comment:2

changed milestone to %sbws: 1.0.x-final

added component::core tor/sbws milestone::sbws: 1.0.x-final owner::juga parent::28042 priority::medium resolution::implemented sbws-1.0-nice-closed-moved-20181128 severity::normal status::closed type::defect labels

This seems reasonable and straightforward to implement in generate.py. No further opinion here at this time.

https://github.com/torproject/sbws/pull/274

Implemented removing link, see comment #28042 (moved)#comment:4

Trac:
Status: assigned to needs_review

This code looks good to me. I think we should merge it.

We could also publish our progress in the bandwidth file header, and not put any relays in the file. See #28076 (moved) in sbws 1.1.

Trac:
Status: needs_review to merge_ready

Based on the comments in #28042 (moved), I think we need to implement #28076 (moved), where we create a file with a header but no relays.

Trac:
Status: merge_ready to needs_revision

Replying to teor:

Based on the comments in #28042 (moved), I think we need to implement #28076 (moved), where we create a file with a header but no relays.

I can add an option to either remove the file or add the header. Would you prefer i then close this ticket and add all of this in #28076 (moved) or merge this and then change it in 28076?

I implemented #28076 (moved) based on the PR here. If #28076 (moved) is accepted, this can be removed

Trac:
Status: needs_revision to needs_review

s/removed/closed/

Merged in #28076 (moved)

Trac:
Resolution: N/A to implemented
Status: needs_review to closed

Move all closed sbws 1.0 nice tickets to sbws 1.0.x-final

Trac:
Keywords: N/A deleted, sbws-1.0-nice-closed-moved-20181128 added
Milestone: sbws 1.0 (MVP nice) to sbws: 1.0.x-final

closed

mentioned in issue #28076 (moved)

mentioned in issue #28085 (moved)

mentioned in issue #28158 (moved)

mentioned in issue #28197 (moved)

moved to tpo/network-health/sbws#28062 (closed)

mentioned in issue tpo/network-health/sbws#28076 (closed)

mentioned in issue tpo/network-health/sbws#28158 (closed)