Changes between Version 2 and Version 3 of Ticket #28329, comment 27


Ignore:
Timestamp:
Feb 4, 2019, 8:06:14 PM (5 months ago)
Author:
dunqan
Comment:

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • Ticket #28329, comment 27

    v2 v3  
    88 * Is there enough affordance in the settings cog as an icon alone, or should we be presenting users with two clear options instead?
    99
    10 https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/attachment/ticket/28329/01-tba-review-1.0.png
     10[[Image(https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/raw-attachment/ticket/28329/01-tba-review-1.0.png, 700px)]]
    1111
    1212== 2.0 (Bootstrapping) ==
     
    1515 * Do we need a link to cancel this process in case it hangs? Or provide a back button to screen 1.0?
    1616
    17 https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/attachment/ticket/28329/01-tba-review-2.0.png
     17[[Image(https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/raw-attachment/ticket/28329/01-tba-review-2.0.png, 700px)]]
    1818
    1919== 3.0 (Network) ==
     
    2222 * Users may not understand that they need to hit the back button to continue (which seems a little counter-intuitive), and could erroneously hit "Change" instead.
    2323
    24 https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/attachment/ticket/28329/01-tba-review-3.0.png
     24[[Image(https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/raw-attachment/ticket/28329/01-tba-review-3.0.png, 700px)]]
    2525
    2626== 4.0 (Combined Network/Bridge proposal) ==
     
    4141However nested radio-buttons may not be the best way to do this – thoughts?
    4242
    43 https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/attachment/ticket/28329/01-tba-review-4.0.png
     43[[Image(https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/raw-attachment/ticket/28329/01-tba-review-4.0.png, 700px)]]
     44
     45Edits: Sorry, took me a few attempts to figure out how to embed images properly!