Opened 7 months ago

Closed 7 months ago

#29438 closed defect (fixed)

In socks-extensions.txt document how we diverge from IETF RFCs for SOCKS5/5a

Reported by: rl1987 Owned by: rl1987
Priority: Medium Milestone: Tor: 0.4.1.x-final
Component: Core Tor/Tor Version:
Severity: Normal Keywords: tor-spec, socks
Cc: Actual Points:
Parent ID: Points:
Reviewer: dgoulet Sponsor:

Description

For example, we violate RFC1929 by allowing empty usernames/passwords.

Things like that should be documented.

Child Tickets

Change History (5)

comment:1 Changed 7 months ago by rl1987

Owner: set to rl1987
Status: newaccepted

comment:2 Changed 7 months ago by rl1987

Summary: In socks-spec.txt document how we diverge from IETF RFCs for SOCKS5/5aIn socks-extensions.txt document how we diverge from IETF RFCs for SOCKS5/5a

comment:3 Changed 7 months ago by rl1987

Status: acceptedneeds_review

comment:4 Changed 7 months ago by nickm

Milestone: Tor: unspecifiedTor: 0.4.1.x-final

comment:5 Changed 7 months ago by dgoulet

Keywords: tor-spec socks added
Resolution: fixed
Reviewer: dgoulet
Status: needs_reviewclosed

Merged! Thanks.

Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets.