Changes between Initial Version and Version 1 of Ticket #30649, comment 8


Ignore:
Timestamp:
Jun 5, 2019, 12:46:02 AM (6 months ago)
Author:
mikeperry
Comment:

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • Ticket #30649, comment 8

    initial v1  
    11Hrmm.. but there is something that origins can do.. They can use ExcludeNodes to blacklist nodes that violoate protocol. Based on the reasoning for having LOG_PROTOCOL_WARN, it sounds like origin-facing procotol warns that mention the idhex and recommend ExcludeNodes should be fine as regular warns.
    22
    3 The reasoning is that I think that some users would prefer padding defenses to using broken nodes. Right now, circpad does not kill the circuit if padding fails in a bizarre way. I am thinking it should, or at least should tell the user and advise them.
     3The reasoning is that I think that some users would prefer having padding defenses work over using broken nodes that violate protocol. Right now, circpad does not kill the circuit if padding fails in a bizarre way. I am thinking it should, or at least should tell the user and advise them.
    44
    55This ticket got a lot more complicated than fixing this bug.. Should we make a different ticket about the warns?