Changes between Initial Version and Version 1 of Ticket #3455, comment 34


Ignore:
Timestamp:
Jul 10, 2014, 5:18:37 PM (5 years ago)
Author:
anon
Comment:

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • Ticket #3455, comment 34

    initial v1  
    88
    99possible solution:
    10 "if you wanted to be friendly, you would use named pipes for those who didn't want to use socks ports on auto. this would avoid any problems with port conflicts, and it would also provide (through sys internals) the same kind of visibility into who the sockspipe consumer was. so perhaps if socks ports are to be used, go the username/pass route.  and if isolation via pipes/sockets is desired, you can do that without username hack"
     10"if you wanted to be friendly, you would use named pipes for those who didn't want to use socks ports on auto. this would avoid any problems with port conflicts, and it would also provide (through sys internals) the same kind of visibility into who the sockspipe consumer was. so perhaps if socks ports are to be used, go the username/pass route.  and if isolation via pipes/unixdomainsockets is desired, you can do that without username hack"