This probably wants to be on maint-0.2.3 if it's needed for testing?
It needs a changes file.
I'm not too sure that I understand the rationale, and that it's truly safe: Is it really a good idea to let testing networks talk to real Bridge authorities?
This probably wants to be on maint-0.2.3 if it's needed for testing?
That could be helpful, yes.
It needs a changes file.
Added, see branch bug6377_rebased2 in my repo.
I'm not too sure that I understand the rationale, and that it's truly safe: Is it really a good idea to let testing networks talk to real Bridge authorities?
You are right, it's not. Changed it to require both
AlternateDirAuthority and AlternateBridgeAuthority, see branch
bug6377_rebased2.
Question is of course if it's wise to let testing networks talk to
real HS authorities. I don't know.
Hmm. It'd be sweet if we could accept AlternateDirAuthority with the
"hs" flag set as the equivalent of AlternateHSAuthority being set.