Opened 8 years ago

Closed 5 years ago

#6430 closed enhancement (duplicate)

Circuit list scares relay operators by using term 'exit'

Reported by: arma Owned by: atagar
Priority: Low Milestone:
Component: Archived/Nyx Version:
Severity: Normal Keywords: connections
Cc: Actual Points:
Parent ID: Points:
Reviewer: Sponsor:


When you attach arm to your shiny new relay, and it does a reachability test by making a circuit back to itself, arm labels the third hop in that circuit the 'Exit'. Which makes at least one user freak out because he thought he set his exit policy to reject *:*.

Perhaps arm should learn whether circuits are Internal or not (via the getinfo details), and call the final hop something other than Exit in that case?

Child Tickets

Change History (7)

comment:1 Changed 8 years ago by atagar

Status: newneeds_information

Sounds good. I'm populating that by querying circuit-status and the curses panel receives a list with...
(circuitID, status, purpose, (fingerprint1, fingerprint2...))

Can I differentiate these circuits by the purpose field? What would you suggest labeling the final hop as?

comment:2 Changed 8 years ago by arma

Yes: those circuits are of type CIRCUIT_PURPOSE_TESTING:

You may also find circuit_purpose_to_controller_string() interesting:

More generally, you should look at the BUILD_FLAGS part of the circuit-status, for ONEHOP_TUNNEL and IS_INTERNAL. ONEHOP_TUNNEL might be called "dir fetch"; you might call the last hop of an IS_INTERNAL circuit the same thing you call the middle hop (depending I guess on what it is); and you might call the last hop on a testing circuit "reachability test" or "test".

comment:3 Changed 8 years ago by atagar

Status: needs_informationassigned

Swapping back to assigned. I'm mostly focused on stem right now but I'm planning to make a sweep through the arm tickets while porting arm over to stem.

comment:4 Changed 6 years ago by arma

This is the same ticket as #12956. Take your pick as to which one is clearer.

comment:5 Changed 6 years ago by isis

Perhaps internal circuits which are not for directory fetches could simply be called "END" hops or "FINAL" hops? Rather than suggesting that anything is actually exiting the network, which seems to be the particular bit of terminology that is frightening folks.

Though I do think that adding multiple new things, one called "DIR FETCH", another called "END", and whatever else is a potentially poor idea in the sense that forcing people to learn too much terminology is overwhelming, and we've already got quite a lot. Perhaps try to pick just one thing, so the reaction doesn't go from "ZOMG, my relay is exiting" to "ZOMG, my relay does I don't even know what". :)

comment:6 Changed 5 years ago by atagar

Keywords: connections added
Priority: MediumLow
Severity: Normal
Summary: arm circuit list scares relay operators by telling them they're an exitCircuit list scares relay operators by using term 'exit'
Type: defectenhancement

comment:7 Changed 5 years ago by atagar

Resolution: duplicate
Status: assignedclosed

Merging with #12956.

Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets.