Changes between Version 169 and Version 170 of doc/FAQUnanswered


Ignore:
Timestamp:
Apr 23, 2010, 10:49:24 AM (9 years ago)
Author:
trac
Comment:

--

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • doc/FAQUnanswered

    v169 v170  
    187187
    188188Is this the way to do this, and just block Slashdot? Any help would be helpful, I've googled, did the tor.eff site, etc. But I'm not real UNIX centric (though thats changing) so just wanted to run it by some community persons. '''
     189
     190
     191'''What is the significance of the changes in the Bittorrent Torify HOWTO?'''
     192
     193I noticed I can't connect with btdownloadcurses through proxychains any more. Looking for answers, I went back to the Torify HOWTO and noticed that it had been altered. Where it used to explain about using proxychains to run bittorrent through TOR, which I used successfully for over a year, it now says that Bittorrent "uses a mechanism similar to TOR." That was certainly news to me. How is the generic Bittorrent client technically similar to TOR in any way? I have always heard that the generic Bittorrent client offers almost no anonimity at all. Now I'm reading that Bittorrent and TOR are practically the same thing and it would be redundant to use them together. Seems a bit curious.
     194
     195As a sub-question, let me just ask directly: Is it true that Bittorrent through TOR via proxychains no longer works?
     196
     197Also, the same page now mentions a technique of using Tor to connect to the tracker only, as opposed to the peers, by including the line --tracker-proxy 127.0.0.1:8118: on the command line. However, I see no documentation of this option in the btdownloadcurses client and I find it a bit suspicious that the format of this option uses a hyphen rather than an underscore as all the other command line options that are listed as being compatible with btdownloadcurses use underscores to separate options with two words such as --check_hashes <arg> or --report_hash_failures <arg>. Is that a typo or an undocumented option that just happens to deviate from the naming convetion of all the other options?
     198
    189199----
    190200CategoryHomepage