Changes between Version 68 and Version 69 of doc/GoodBadISPs


Ignore:
Timestamp:
Apr 23, 2010, 10:49:27 AM (9 years ago)
Author:
trac
Comment:

--

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • doc/GoodBadISPs

    v68 v69  
    88ISPs we've had good experiences with:
    99 * Cox.net(US) is great when it comes to running any sort of server. They only block ports 80, 25, and 9001 (as far as I know), and they don't monitor bandwidth usage at all. I haven't had any problems with them, and I use dozens of GB of in and out bandwidth per month.  -- DavidBendit [[DateTime(2005-06-22T05:54:22Z)]]
     10 * IPX-Server.de (DE) has generous traffic limits (there are contracts including 1TB/Mo) and behaves as I'd expect it from good partners. Some BSA-notice regarding Torrents arrived, they informed me and told me to stop this "illegal activities" and said, after reading and (at least it seems so) understanding my reply explaining tor with "ok, we won't interfere, your problem".
    1011
    1112ISPs we've had bad experiences with: